Walden v. Fiore
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
*1119 Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
*279 This case asks us to decide whether a court in Nevada may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant on the basis that he knew his allegedly tortious conduct in Georgia would delay the return of funds to plaintiffs with connections to Nevada. Because the defendant had no other contacts with Nevada, and because a plaintiff's contacts with the forum State cannot be "decisive in determining whether the defendant's due process rights are violated," Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320 , 332, 100 S.Ct. 571 , 62 L.Ed.2d 516 (1980), we hold that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,747 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Bernard Picot v. Dean WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- International Energy Ventures Management, L.L.C. v. United Energy Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Axiom Foods, Inc. v. Acerchem International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3,742 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.