Law School Admission Council, Inc. v. Tatro
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEARNEY, District Judge.
The parties, centrally involved in the rite of passage for lawyers known as the Law School* Admission Test, posit a federal jurisdiction and venue question with an overlay of deference to a prior filed action between them. Our study confirms we must first ascertain personal jurisdiction and venue, and then consider venue transfer based on a prior filed pending action. After testing applicable principles, we exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant and find venue appropriate. But because Defendant here first filed an action in California against the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phx. Ins. Co. v. Teva Pharm. Indus. Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Monzo v. BazosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Cymbal Properties, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021
- Carl Simon v. Corrections Corporation of America (n/k/a CoreCivic., Inc.)District Court, Virgin Islands · 2021
- DEARDORFF v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.