Legal Opinion

Daimler AG v. Bauman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 2014No. 11-965PublishedCited by 4,705 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

*120 This case concerns the authority of a court in the United States to entertain a claim brought by foreign plaintiffs against a foreign defendant based on events occurring entirely outside the United States. The litigation commenced in 2004, when twenty-two Argentinian residents 1 filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District *121 of California against DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft *751 (Daimler), 2 a German public stock company, headquartered in Stuttgart, that manufactures Mercedes-Benz vehicles in Germany. The complaint alleged that during Argentina's…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,705 opinions

  1. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  4. BNSF Ry. Co. v. TyrrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

4,700 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API