Legal Opinion
Dermansky v. The Young Turks, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 5, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00345Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JULIE DERMANSKY, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 22-345-GBW THE YOUNG TURKS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is Defendant The Young Turks, Inc.’s (“Young Turks” or “Defendant”) Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and to Transfer Venue to the Central District of California (the “Motion,” see D.I. 10), which is opposed by Plaintiff Julie Dermansky (“Dermansky” or “Plaintiff’). See DJ. 19. For the reasons set out below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD Section…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- In Re Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Smart Audio Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.