Colbert v. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Carter County; 8. Ii. Russell, Judge. Aetiom by the First National Bank of Ardmore against Walter Colbert.- Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, C. J.
This suit was instituted originally by defendant in error in "the court below against plaintiff in error, Walter Colbert, and one B. H. Colbert, on three promissory notes of $2,000 each, dated October 7, 1905, upon which there was a credit of $1,765.12. The suit in the lower court resulted in a judgment against defendant for the balance due on the notes, from which this appeal is prosecuted by plaintiff in error. The notes are all similar and are of the usual form of promissory notes, complete and unambiguous in their terms, by which they bind the makers, unconditionally, to pay to defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Charles v. DenisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Adams v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.