Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Gold Hill Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1902No. 4167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Leandeb H. Pba-theb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the. court was delivered by

White, J.

— The amended complaint in this action, omitting title and jurat, is as follows:

“Plaintiff, by this his first amended complaint, alleges:
“1. That at all the times herein mentioned he was, and still is, a resident of the city of Spokane, Washington, and that the defendant Gold Hill Mining Company was, and still is, a duly incorporated mining company, organized and existing under the laws of the state of Washington, having filed its articles of incorporation in the county auditor’s office of Spokane county on October 2, 1895. [And that, among…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dormitzer v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Young v. South Tredegar Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Moody's Heirs v. MoellerTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Uphoff v. Chicago, St. L. & N. O. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Peck v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bowman v. BreyfogleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Woodworth v. School District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lino v. HoleWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API