Legal Opinion

Galena National Bank v. Ripley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1909No. 8280PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered May 28, 1909, granting defendant a new trial in an action on promissory notes.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was commenced by the Galena National Bank, a corporation, against E. Ripley, to recover the amount claimed to be due on three promissory notes. On trial without a jury, the court ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Thereupon the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was sustained, and the plaintiff has appealed from the order granting the new trial.

The complaint is in usual form, based upon three promissory notes executed by the respondent, who pleaded want of consideration. The evidence discloses the following facts: That respondent’s father was for many years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bissinger v. LawsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Nowlin v. WessonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Carpenter v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. StotskyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Dittmar v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API