Legal Opinion
Chase v. AIMCO Properties, L.P.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-1683(JR)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Before the Court in this proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), is a motion for court-supervised notice to similarly situated employees and for class certification as to plaintiffs’ allegations of Maryland and California state labor law violations.
Defendants AIMCO Properties and NHP Management Company own and operate over 1,500 apartment communities located throughout the country. The plaintiffs, nine named individuals employed by AIMCO in Maryland, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, and California, seek to represent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Castillo v. P & R ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dinkel v. Medstar Health, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Encinas v. J.J. Drywall CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gayle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.