Legal Opinion
Encinas v. J.J. Drywall Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 8, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-1156PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Gabriel and Felix Encinas and Silvano Carbajal bring claims on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated against defendants J.J. Drywall Corporation and Jose Luis Jimenez under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and various District of Columbia and Maryland statutes to recover unpaid overtime and other wages. The plaintiffs have filed unopposed motions to conditionally certify the collective class challenging the denial of overtime compensation under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Stephens v. Farmers Rest. Grp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alvarez v. Keystone Plus Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.