Legal Opinion
Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 2008No. 3:CV-06-1968PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge.
Before the Court in this action to recover overtime compensation are (1) Defendant FedEx Freight East, Inc.’s (“FedEx Freight”) Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Class and Collective Action Allegations Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(d), or, in the alternative, for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e) (“Motion to Strike or for More Definite Statement”), (Dkt. Entry 3); and (2) Plaintiff William Woodard’s Motion to Toll the Running of the FLSA Statute of Limitations Period (“Motion to Toll FLSA-SOL”). (Dkt. Entry…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Premier Payments Online, Inc. v. Payment Systems WorldwideDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Goode v. Lexisnexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Pereira v. Foot Locker, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Adami v. Cardo Windows, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.