Legal Opinion
Castillo v. P & R ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 19, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1195 (CKK)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this case allege that Defendant P & R Enterprises, Inc. violated the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216, and the District of Columbia Minimum Wage Act Revision Act, D.C.Code § 32-1012(b), by failing to pay overtime compensation to employees for hours worked in excess of forty per week. 1 Before the Court is Plaintiffs [2] Motion for Order Giving Notice to Potential Plaintiff Employees. Upon a review of the Parties’ submissions, the applicable case law and statutory authority, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Phillip N. Lockhart, Charles B. Wilson, James Lowery, James P. Durham and Thomas Bradley v. Westinghouse Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hunter v. Sprint Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Houston v. URS Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Diaz v. N.Y. Paving Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Encinas v. J.J. Drywall CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gayle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Pelczynski v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.