State v. Ingram
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Presiding Judge.
The state of Ohio appeals, pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J), from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Clark County granting defendant-appellee Herbert K. Ingram’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from a warrantless search of his person. The state contends that Ingram voluntarily consented to the search. The trial court found that: (1) there was a sufficient show of authority that Ingram was effectively seized, finding that “obviously, the officers would have kept him from leaving if he had attempted to leave at that time”; (2) the officers had no reasonable grounds to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. DanbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. OjezuaOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. GarciaOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.