Legal Opinion
State v. Edmonds
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 13, 2016No. SC19389PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.
The defendant, Michael Edmonds, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming his conviction, following a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of one count of possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a), and one count of failure to appear in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-172. See State v. Edmonds, 151 Conn.App. 763 , 765, 96 A.3d 607 (2014). On certification to this court, the defendant contends that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that: (1) the trial court, Rodriguez, J., in denying the defendant's…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CastilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- 21SA110 - People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.