Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2002No. Case No. 01 CA 120PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties’ briefs. Defendant-appellant, James Edward Brown, ap peals from the judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that determined he was a sexual predator in accordance with R.C. 2950.09. We are asked to decide whether the trial court (1) had jurisdiction to conduct the sexual predator proceeding, (2) properly admitted certain evidence during that proceeding, and (3) determined that Brown is a sexual predator by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude that the trial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Butler, Billy DeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. PurserOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. WynnOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. LakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API