Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of De Marco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 19, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.
Claimant refused a job offer from a temporary employment agency because it would interfere with scheduled job interviews which could lead to permanent employment. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of RuggieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of FaillaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of FronczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of StehnachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007