Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rogers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 5, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed by a temporary placement agency. After completing a temporary assignment which paid $20 per hour, claimant filed for and received unemployment insurance benefits. An initial determination was made that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she refused an offer of employment without good…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of GuzenskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BoudreauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of FairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of GroganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of GraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of PerriconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011