Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Faillace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 18, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 3, 2003, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she declined an offer of suitable employment without good cause. Claimant rejected an employment agency’s offer of a temporary administrative assistant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RuggieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of CorcoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of LoweryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. In re the Claim of YatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of FronczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API