Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Fronczak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 24, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment in*899surance benefits because he refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he declined an offer of suitable employment without good cause. Claimant declined a temporary employment agency’s offer of a position with a food…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NappiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of FaillaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of YatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GuzenskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of PelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API