Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 28, 2005No. 00-40CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the United States’ (the “government’s”) Motion to Dismiss and General Motors Corporation’s (“GM’s” or the “plaintiffs”) cross-motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART the government’s motion and GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART GM’s motion.
BACKGROUND
The facts relevant to these motions are not in dispute and can be briefly summarized as follows. GM is a corporation that, inter alia, provides products and services under prime contracts with the United States government. One…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy v. Sherwood Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Texas Health Choice, L.C. v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Allegheny Teledyne Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raytheon Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Viacom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- CBS Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.