Legal Opinion
Viacom, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 8, 2006No. 01-79CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the United States’ (“the government’s”) and Viacom, Inc.’s (“Viacom’s” or “plaintiffs”) Cross Motions for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART the government’s motion and GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Viacom’s motion.
BACKGROUND
This case is another in a series of cases involving the scope and application of both the original Cost Accounting Standard (“CAS”) 413.50(c), 48 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Dana Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raytheon Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- CBS Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.