Legal Opinion
Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 31, 1997No. 97-5012PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Barseback Kraft AB and Empresa Nacional del Uranio, S.A. appeal the summary judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, 36 Fed. Cl. 691 (1996), dismissing their complaint that the United States Enrichment Corporation had overcharged them for uranium enrichment services. Because (1) the contracts at issue permit the government to charge any price below the ceiling, (2) the government has not violated any alleged treaty rights, and (3) the government is not recovering its decommissioning and decontamination costs twice, we affirm.
Background
Empresa Nacional del…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jill K. Massie, as Mother and Next Friend of Autumn Massie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Jowett, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.