Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 14, 2007No. 00-40CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment related to the actuarial assumptions to be used to calculate a segnent-closing adjustment to pension costs under Cost Accounting Standard 413 (“CAS 413” or “original CAS 413”), 48 C.F.R. § 9904.413-50(c)(12) (1993).1 This is the third in a series of decisions in this ease regarding the proper interpretation of CAS 413.50(c)(12).2 This provision provides, in relevant part, as follows: “If a segment is closed, the contractor shall determine the difference between the actuarial liability…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. General Electric Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API