General Motors Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment related to the actuarial assumptions to be used to calculate a segnent-closing adjustment to pension costs under Cost Accounting Standard 413 (“CAS 413” or “original CAS 413”), 48 C.F.R. § 9904.413-50(c)(12) (1993).1 This is the third in a series of decisions in this ease regarding the proper interpretation of CAS 413.50(c)(12).2 This provision provides, in relevant part, as follows: “If a segment is closed, the contractor shall determine the difference between the actuarial liability…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Andrus v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- General Electric Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.