Legal Opinion
Stovall v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 13, 2010No. 05-400CPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
Michael Stovall (plaintiff), an African-American farmer, brings this action for damages arising out of the alleged breach of his settlement agreement with the Farm Sendee *341Agency (FSA), an arm of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Defendant has moved for summary judgment under RCFC 56, admitting that whether this agreement was breached presents questions of fact, but claiming, as a matter of law, that plaintiff has inadequately supported his damage claims. Plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment, contending that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Parkwood Associates Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Carolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.