Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 2017No. A15-1438PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEIG, Justice.

The question presented in thjs case is whether the “proceeds awarded” to an insured under Minn. Stat. § 604.18 (2016)— which authorizes the award of “taxable costs” when an insurer denies benefits without a reasonable basis—are capped by the insurance policy limit. The district court answered that question in the affirmative and held that Wilbur’s underin-sured-motorist policy limit capped the amount of his award under the plain language of section 604.18. Wilbur challenged that determination. The court of appeals affirmed after determining that the statute was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Selective Ins. Co. of S.C. v. SelaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  2. Burt v. Rackner, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Selective Insurance Co. of SC v. Amit SelaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Marcellino Pena v. Bob KindlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Great West Cas. Co. v. DeckerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API