Legal Opinion

Kunkle v. Soule

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1920No. 9835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mesa District Court, Hon. ■Thomas J. Black, Judge. Application for Supersedeas.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The defendants .in error brought suit against Kunkle and The National' Radium Products Company to cancel 51,000 shares of stock in the defendant company which had been issued to defendant Kunkle. The trial was to the court; judgment for plaintiff that the stock be surrendered. Kunkle brings error and moves for supersedeas.

The complaint stated that the only consideration for the stock was the assignment to the company by Kunkle of a certain process for extracting uranium, vanadium and radium from ores, and that the process was worthless.

A demurrer to this complaint was overruled, because,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Langdon v. FoggU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  5. Stewart v. St. Louis, Ft. S. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Soule v. KunkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Barnard v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API