Legal Opinion

Soule v. Kunkle

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 6, 1922No. 10,057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to cancel corporate stock issued to defendants. Judgment of dismissal. Error to the District Court of Mesa, County, Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The court below dismissed the bill and plaintiffs bring *222error. The facts may be found in Kunkle v. Soule, 68 Colo. 524, 190 Pac. 536. A judgment for plaintiffs having been there reversed, they amended their complaint so as to set up matters of fraud on the part of Kunkle as well as want of consideration for the issue to him of fifty-one per cent, 51,000 shares, of the capital stock of The National Radium Products Company, and, upon retrial, the court, with no special finding, found the issues generally for defendant.

Upon the question of fraud the finding settles the matter and we think it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Jones v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Kunkle v. SouleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Barnard v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Davis v. LarsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Bowers v. RIO GRANDE INVESTMENT COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Ætna Insurance v. RicoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API