Stewart v. St. Louis, Ft. S. & W. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
At Law.
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The plaintiff brings his action to recover on several promissory notes issued by the defendant company, amounting in the aggregate to $85,000. The defendant, by its answer, denies that A. M. Ayers as president, and Ira D. Bronson as secretary, of said company, had authority to execute or issue said notes; that said notes were fraudulently and wrongfully issued through the collusion of the officers and directors of the company, and without any consideration whatever therefor. The facts, in brief, are as follows: In January, 1880, one M. S. Carter, of St. Louis, was the owner of a railroad bed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hotel Co. v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Parker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Van Cott v. . Van BruntNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pietsch v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- National Loan & Investment Co. v. Rockland Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Taussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Montana Tonopah Mining Co. v. DunlapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.