State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
The Coeur d’Alene Tribe (“Tribe”) appeals the preliminary injunction prohibiting the Tribe from offering Texas Hold’em (“Hold’em”) poker. The Tribe argues that tribal sovereign immunity was not abrogated and that venue was improper under the terms of the Tribal-State Gaming Compact (“Compact”). We affirm because the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) severed tribal immunity and the Compact did not bar the litigation. Lastly, we affirm the grant of injunctive relief because the district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wayne Land & Mineral Grp. LLC v. Del. River Basin Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- California v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.