Legal Opinion
E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 19, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-06810-JSTPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Once again, the parties are before the Court regarding a rule issued recently by the Attorney General and the Department of Homeland Security. The rule, in combination with a Presidential proclamation, makes anyone who crosses the southern border of the United States somewhere other than a designated port of entry ineligible for asylum.
Plaintiffs previously asked the Court to issue a temporary restraining order against the new rule. After considering the arguments on both sides and holding a hearing, the Court found the rule was inconsistent with the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- State v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Sierra Club v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.