Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1944No. 29453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action on two life insurance policies, of the face amount of one thousand dollars each, issued by defendant to one Boyd Bennett. The policies contain a stipulation for double indemnity for accidental death. The plaintiff is the widow of the insured and sues as the beneficiary under the policies.

Bennett underwent an operation for hernia on August 3, 1943. With in a few minutes after the completion of the operation, and while he was still on the operating table, he died.

Proofs of death having been submitted to it, the defendant paid the amounts of the face value of the policies, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Taylor v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kane v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kearney v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McKinnon v. Republic National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  3. McKinnon v. Republic National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API