Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McKinnon v. Republic National Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 15, 1980No. 3537-IIPublished

1ConcurrenceReed, C.J.

(concurring) — I concur in the result reached by the majority. However, I believe Mrs. McKinnon's case highlights the pressing, if not urgent, need for a reexamination of the rule to which the courts of this state now pay allegiance and appear to be committed.

First, the cases in which our Supreme Court has invoked the Zinn-Euans2 rule and not found accident are distinguishable on their facts from the case at bar; these cases involved an intentional act which resulted in death because some internal condition made the decedent predisposed to *861the injury, which occurred in the performance of an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Schonberg v. New York Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API