Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1965No. 37632Published
1Opinion of the Court
67 Wn.2d 60 (1965)
406 P.2d 628
CLARENCE TUCKER, Respondent,
v.
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY CO., Appellant.[*]
No. 37632.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
October 7, 1965.
Leavy & Taber, by James Leavy, for appellant.
Horton & Wilkins, by Hugh B. Horton, for respondent.
HUNTER, J.
This is an action by Clarence Tucker, plaintiff (respondent), against Bankers Life & Casualty Company, defendant (appellant), to recover total disability benefits under a Bankers Life accident-insurance policy purchased by the plaintiff.
The trial court awarded the plaintiff judgment for the maximum benefits afforded…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Driskell v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Tucker v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.