Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Snell, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mount, J.
Action to recover upon an accident insurance policy issued by appellant to John Horsfall during his lifetime. The respondent, Kate Horsfall, is the beneficiary under the policy in case of the death of the insured as the result of an accident covered by the policy. Plaintiff had judgment below, and defendant appeals.
The policy of insurance is in the usual form of accident insurance, and provides, among other things, for a weekly indemnity in case of injury from accident, and for a principal sum of $1,200 to he paid to the wife of the insured in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Menneiley v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pennington v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
- Lickleider v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Zappala v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.