Cloney v. City of Kalamazoo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Case by Morgan Cloney against the city of Kalamazoo for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
It appears that the defendant city, in the summer of 1896, contracted with certain parties to pave Burdick street. That street crosses Main street at right angles, and is 66 feet wide. Main street is 100 feet wide. Prior to September 1, 1896, the pavement had been completed up to the north line of Main street, leaving only the intersection of the streets to complete the pavement. Burdick street had formerly been paved with cedar blocks, and, in doing the work of ’ repaving, the contractors took up those blocks and a few inches of dirt, and filled the space with about 6 inches of broken stone…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Graves v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Brezee v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Grandorf v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Irion v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Vincent v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Hunt v. Township of DouglassMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Barker v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Belyea v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1904