Legal Opinion

Graves v. City of Battle Creek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $500 in an action on the case for an injury received by a fall occasioned by a defective sidewalk. But four assignments of error are discussed in the defendant’s brief, 'and under the settled practice of the Court no other assignments can be considered.

The plaintiff appeared as a witness, and the jury observed her use of the injured arm and wrist. Dr. Alvord, a witness for the plaintiff, testified to its condition and the prospect of recovery, and was asked the folloAving question:

“Doctor, is the fact that the plaintiff is' able to us'e her arm in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Owens v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. CluckTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lane v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Strudgeon v. Village of Sand BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API