Legal Opinion

James S. Baker (Imports) Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 19, 1968No. C.D. 3619PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

In this action plaintiffs protest the classification of two importations of lawn rakes manufactured in Japan as “rakes, other” under item 648.57 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, with the consequent assessment of duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

*306Plaintiffs claim that the subject rakes should be properly classified as “agricultural or horticultural tools,” under item 648.55 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, which provides for duty at the rate of 7.5 per centum ad valorem.

The pertinent statutory provisions read as follows:

Tariff Schedules of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. United States v. TowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Geo. S. Bush Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. International Bus. MacH. Corp. v. State, Dept. of TreasuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API