Legal Opinion

United States v. Tower

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1916No. 1639PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38713.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The present articles are certain 14 bundles of rakes, which were imported under the tariff act of 1913. The rake heads are metal, the handles wood. '

The collector assessed duty upon the importations at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem under the provision for manufactures in chief value of metal contained in paragraph 167 of the act.

The importer protested, claiming free entry for the articles under the free-list provision for agricultural implements contained in paragraph 391 of the act.

The issue was submitted to the Board of General Appraisers, who sustained the protest. The Government now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Lun ChongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Great Western Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. James S. Baker (Imports) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API