Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Baldwin

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1942No. 47PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, Sec. 205(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925(a), by Leon Henderson, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, to enjoin defendants from demanding, or receiving, rent in the Erie Defense Rental Area in violation of the price-schedule effective in that area under the provisions of Section 2 of that Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 902.

A preliminary injunction was granted, and the case came on for trial on the complaint, answer and proofs.

The facts of the case are briefly these. By Maximum Rent Regulations No.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. National Erie Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Bowles v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Henderson v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. United States v. PinkstonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API