Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 16, 1938No. 756PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Per curiam
In September, 1933, the Federal, Trade Commission charged respondent, The Goodyear Tire & Rub oer Company, with the- violation of § 2 of the Clayton Act (15 U. S. C. 13) in selling tires, tubes, etc. to Sears, Roebuck & Company at discriminatory, prices. Respondent, invok ing the first proviso in § 2, 1 contended that its contracts with Sears, Roebuck & Company for sales involving lower net prices than those charged to independent dealers were made because of the great difference in the quantities sold. After hearing, the Commission ruled that it did not consider a difference in price to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.