Legal Opinion
Berry v. McCormick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1923No. 11575PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This action was commenced by F. P. McCormick, defendant in error, plaintiff below, in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., against J. H. Berry, plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purpose of enforcing the collection of certain tax bills issued to McCormick by the city of Tulsa, and for the purpose of having a lien on certain real estate of the plaintiff in error foreclosed and the real estate ordered sold to pay the indebtedness evidenced by said tax bills.
The city of Tulsa is a municipal corporation organized and existing under a free-íolders’ charter…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Mitchell v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kansas City v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- County Commissioners v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Wewoka v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Ponca City v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Nix v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bagley v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.