Legal Opinion
Warner, Trustee v. Day
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1946No. 32157PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The controversy involved herein arose from a tax resale of lots 3 and 4 in block 8 of the Higgins addition to the city of Muskogee, Okla. The facts, as we understand them, are substantially as hereinafter related.
In 1929, under an oral arrangement between himself, R. C. Borum, and W. S. Warner, whereby he purchased real estate at tax sales with joint funds of the three, E. S. Warner purchased the above described lots for himself and his said associates at a tax resale held that year (presumably for delinquent ad valorem taxes only), taking title in his name as trustee for himself and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Bowls v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Burnett v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Gilman v. HeitmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Dowler v. State Ex Rel. PruntySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Colby v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Born v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Stephenson v. BonneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Knutter v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- McClaren v. SteeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.