Legal Opinion

United States v. Corning Glass Works

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 16, 1978No. 78-5PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Markey, Chief Judge.

The government appeals from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 79 Cust. Ct. 72, C.D. 4716,448 F. Supp. 262 (1977) 1 sustaining *26Coming Glass Works’ (Coming’s) protest relating to imported ampul inspection machines. The Customs Court held that proper classification was under item 678.50, TSUS, as “machines not specially provided for * * * .” We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

The imported goods are machines used to inspect drug-containing ampuls for foreign matter in the drug solution, and for defects in the ampuls.

A conveying rod moves filled and sealed ampuls from an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Customs Brokg. Co., Inc., A/c Hamakua Mill Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Akawo v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Amaco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. United States v. H. Rosenthal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. Rohm and Haas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API