Legal Opinion

Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1970No. Customs Appeal 5380PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, C.D. 3870, insofar as it overruled two protests by appellant to the classification of merchandise described as “#1000 Educational Kits” and “#1553 Microscope Dissecting Kits” as “sets” under Item 651.75 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). We affirm the judgment as to the #1000 kits and reverse as to the #1553 kits. Although the classifications were both under the same TSUS item, they present different questions and will therefore be discussed separately.

I. # 1000 Educational Kits

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  5. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API