Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 19, 1979No. [No. 130, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Digges, Cole and Davidson, JJ„ dissent and Davidson, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Digges and Cole, JJ., join at page 321 infra. See per curiam filed July 19, 1979, in denying motion for reconsideration at page 334 infra.

This appeal draws into question the proper application of Maryland Rule 746 which governs the scheduling of criminal cases for trial. The rule provides:

“a. General Provision.

Within 30 days after the earlier of the appearance of counsel or the first appearance of the defendant before the court pursuant to Rule 723 (Appearance — Provision for or Waiver of Counsel), a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bunch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Guarnera v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Goins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API