Legal Opinion

Montgomery County v. Deibler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 27, 2011No. 120, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

Section 9-615 of the Maryland Code (1999, 2008 Repl.Vol.), Labor and Employment Article (“L.E.”) creates a two-part process for compensating temporary partial disabilities that result from work accidents or occupational diseases. 1 First, to be eligible for compensation, an employee’s “wage earning capacity” while temporarily, partially disabled must be “less” than that employee’s pre-disability wage earning capacity. L.E. § 9 — 615(a)(1). Then, if the employee is found to be eligible for compensation, the compensation owed the employee is calculated by halving the difference between the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Bottini v. Dept. of Finance, Montgomery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API