Legal Opinion

Unger v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 24, 2012No. 111PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN C. ELDRIDGE (Retired, Specially Assigned), J.

I

This is an action under the Maryland Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, now codified as Maryland Code (2001, 2008 Repl.Vol.), § 7-101 et seq. of the Criminal Procedure Article. The action involves the Maryland constitutional provision, Article 23, paragraph one, of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, which provides in mandatory language as follows:

“In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as well as of fact, except that the Court may pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction.” 1

Before…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Barclay v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Anne Arundel Cty. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. State v. WaineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API