Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Estill

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 11, 1958No. 11,091PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

HomeR Ferguson, Judge:

The single issue in this case, which comes here by way of certification from The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, is whether the board of review has “as a matter of law, the authority to reduce the period of suspension of execution of part of a sentence which period has been prescribed by the convening authority in his action.”

The accused pleaded guilty before a special court-martial to three specifications alleging disrespectful language toward superior petty officers, in contravention of Article 91, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 891.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. SimmonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. AtkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. ButtsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. KellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. MayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. DarvilleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. HoltU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. SilvernailU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API