Legal Opinion

United States v. Keller

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 5, 1975No. 29,343PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fletcher, Chief Judge:

We granted review to determine whether the convening authority’s failure to set forth his reasons for taking an action which differed from that recommended by his staff judge advocate requires remedial action. At issue is the meaning of paragraph 85c, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Rev.), which provides:

Ordinarily, the convening authority should accept the opinion of his staff judge advocate or legal officer as to the effect of any error or irregularity respecting the proceedings, as to the adequacy of the evidence, and as to what…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. EstillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. PrinceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. EllerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. WetzelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. SilvernailU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. CherokU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. DixsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API