Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Cain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1968No. 614PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Plaintiff’s action is brought under the wrongful death statute, G.S. 28-173, et seq., against defendants as joint tort-feasors.

Appellee Cain contends that plaintiff can have only one recovery and that when plaintiff accepted the full amount of the judgment entered against defendant Haddock, plaintiff’s appeal became moot. The statute (G.S. 28-173, et seq.) contemplates only one cause of action, and when the action is brought by the personal representative, the judgment is 'conclusive on other persons, and the right given by the statute is exhausted. 16 Am. Jur., Death, § 161, p. 103.

Clearly,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Ramsey v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. MacFarlane v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Sircey v. Hans Rees' SonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. King v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barnes Ex Rel. Underwood v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Benvenue Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. Nash County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Matter of SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. CorkumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API