Legal Opinion

Barnes Ex Rel. Underwood v. McGee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1974No. 7418SC98PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A judgment on the merits in favor of the employee precludes any action against the employer where, as here, the employer’s liability is purely derivative. Taylor v. Hatchery, Inc., 251 N.C. 689, 111 S.E. 2d 864; Pinnix v. Griffin, 221 N.C. 348, 20 S.E. 2d 366.

If the judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ action against the employee, McGee, is a judgment on the merits, plaintiffs’ right to proceed against the employer has been proscribed. In that event alleged errors in dismissing the action against the employer are without practical significance and should not he reviewed on appeal.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Denny v. MathieuSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Kendrick v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Taylor v. Denton Hatchery, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Maryland ex rel. Geils v. Baltimore Transit Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial Division, and State of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae. Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API