Barnes Ex Rel. Underwood v. McGee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
A judgment on the merits in favor of the employee precludes any action against the employer where, as here, the employer’s liability is purely derivative. Taylor v. Hatchery, Inc., 251 N.C. 689, 111 S.E. 2d 864; Pinnix v. Griffin, 221 N.C. 348, 20 S.E. 2d 366.
If the judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ action against the employee, McGee, is a judgment on the merits, plaintiffs’ right to proceed against the employer has been proscribed. In that event alleged errors in dismissing the action against the employer are without practical significance and should not he reviewed on appeal.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Denny v. MathieuSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Kendrick v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Taylor v. Denton Hatchery, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Maryland ex rel. Geils v. Baltimore Transit Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965
3Cited by42 opinions
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Ladonna Harrison v. Edison Brothers Apparel Stores, Incorporated, and Melvin Wall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial Division, and State of North Carolina, Amicus Curiae. Itco Corporation v. Michelin Tire Corporation, Commercial DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.